Understanding
and Interpreting Spinal Injuries in Compliance with the AMA
Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition,
2001
(Recommendation:
This is an overview. Please obtain and read a copy of the AMA
Guides, Fifth Edition for a complete understanding of thisinformation
and its use.)
Injuries
to the spine cause (1) functional loss and (2) structural damage.
Functional loss is the resultant effect of the injury on normal
body systems. These include but are not limited to: muscular
strength, joint mobility, coordination, and sensory perception.
Structural damage includes the fracture of bones, dislocation
or subluxation of spinal joints/segmental somatic dysfunction,
and the tearing of joint capsules, discs, and other connective
tissue. Other connective tissue includes supporting ligaments,
tendons, muscles, nerves, and blood vessels.
Demonstrating
the effect of spinal injuries is dependant upon the examination
performed on the patient, the documentation of these findings
and finally the appropriate interpretation and reporting of
the information gathered.
EXAMINATION:
The
examination should confirm or deny the presence of functional
loss and structural damage.
Functional
Losses can be evaluated by measuring spinal ranges of motion,
extremity strength, muscle spasm or guarding, muscular atrophy,
reflexes, and dermatomal sensory loss. Other functional losses
such as bowl and bladder dysfunction, corticospinal tract impairments,
or spinal cord injuries must be added using the combined values
chart (AMA Guides pp 604-606).
To
adequately demonstrate structural damage, imaging studies should
be performed. Plain film radiography, including flexion / extension
views, provide evidence of fracture, instability, arthrosis,
and loss of motion segment integrity (MSI). MRI / CT exams are
more useful to demonstrate disc bulges and disc herniations
which in turn strongly suggests the presence of nerve root or
cord compression.
DOCUMENTATION:
Loss
of Motion Segment Integrity must be demonstrated on flexion/extension
radiographs. The AMA Guide, pages 378-379, describes a motion
segment as two adjacent vertebrae and their related joints and
ligamentous structures. Specific, normal motions are expected
at different levels of the spine. Aberrancies in this normal
motion can be evaluated by measuring losses in ranges of motion
(subluxation / fixation, arthrosis and/or degeneration) or by
demonstrating hypermobility and instability with Loss of Motion
Segment Integrity.
Two
types of MSI are explained: Translation and Angular Motion (saggital
rotation).
- Translation
loss is a measured amount of saggital sliding of one vertebra
on another. For the cervical spine, a value greater than
3.5 millimeters of measured sliding is a loss of structural
integrity (pp. 378, 379, 392, 394). For the thoracic spine,
a value greater than 2.5 millimeters of measured sliding
is a loss of structural integrity (pp. 378, 379, 389, 391).
For the lumbar spine, a value greater than 4.5 millimeters
of measured sliding is a loss of structural integrity (pp.
378, 379, 384, 387).
- Angular
Motion is a measured amount of saggital rotation. For the
cervical spine, a vertebra that moves 11 degrees greater
than an adjacent motor unit is considered to be a loss of
MSI (pp. 378, 379, 392, 394). For example: If C3 vertebra
has 20 degrees of motion in relation to C4 and C4 has 5
degrees of motion in relation to C5 then C3-C4 motion segment
has a loss of structural integrity (> 11 degrees). For
the lumbar spine, MSI values are measured at the motion
segment in question and not compared to adjacent motor units.
For levels L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4 a measured saggital rotation
greater than 15 degrees is a loss of structural integrity.
For level L4-L5 a measured saggital rotation greater than
20 degrees is a loss of structural integrity. For L5-S1
a measured saggital rotation greater than 25 degrees is
a loss of structural integrity. The thoracic spine is not
discussed in the AMA Guide for saggital rotation measurement.
Methods for measuring MSI are demonstrated in tables 15-3a,b
and c, pp. 378-379.
INTERPRETATION:
(DRE)
Diagnosis Related Estimates Method of Assigning Impairment Rating
Based on the AMA Guide to Permanent Impairment, 2001 pp. 373-431.
The
DRE method is the principal methodology used to evaluate an
individual who has a distinct injury (pp. 379)
Cervical Spine (pp. 392-394)
Category
I (0%)
- No
significant clinical findings
- No
muscle spasm or guarding
- No
documentable neurological impairment
- No
alteration in structural integrity
- No
fractures
Category
II (5-8%)
- History
and exam relevant to a specific injury
May
include:
- Muscle
spasm
- Asymmetrical
loss of range of motion
- Complaints
of radiculopathy without objective findings
- No
alteration of structural integrity
Or:
- Significant
radiculopathy
- Disc
herniation at expected site verified by imaging study
- Patient
improved after nonoperative treatment
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- Less
than 25% compression of one vertebral body
- Healed
posterior element fracture without loss of structural integrity
or radiculopathy
- Spinous
or transverse process fracture with displacement
Category
III (15-18%)
Significant
signs of radiculopathy:
- Dermatomal
pain and/or sensory loss
- Loss
of reflexes
- Loss
of strength
- Muscular
atrophy
- Neurologic
impairment verified by electrodiagnosis
Or:
- Significant
radiculopathy with disc herniation verified by imaging study
- Improvement
of radiculopathy following surgery
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- 25-50%
compression of one vertebral body (healed without loss of
structural integrity)
- Posterior
element fracture with displacement into the spinal canal
(healed without loss of structural integrity)
Category
IV (25-28%)
- Bilateral
or multilevel radiculopathy.
- Alteration
in motion segment integrity determined from flexion extension
radiographs as 3.5mm or greater of translation or angular
motion 11 degrees greater than each adjacent level (radiculopathy
need not be present).
Or:
- More
than 50% compression of one vertebral body without residual
neurological compromise.
Category
V (35-38%)
- Significant
impairment of the upper extremity requiring adaptive functional
devices.
- Single
level total neurologic loss.
- Multilevel
neurological dysfunction.
Thoracic Spine
(pp. 388-391)
Category
I (0%)
- No
significant clinical findings
- No
muscle spasm or guarding
- No
documentable neurological impairment
- No
alteration in structural integrity
- No
fractures
Category
II (5-8%)
- History
and exam relevant to a specific injury
May
include:
- Muscle
spasm
- Asymmetrical
loss of range of motion
- Complaints
of radiculopathy without objective findings
- No
alteration of structural integrity
Or:
- Disc
herniation at expected site verified by imaging study
- No
radicular signs after nonoperative treatment
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- Less
than 25% compression of one vertebral body
- Healed
posterior element fracture without loss of structural integrity
or radiculopathy
- Spinous
or transverse process fracture with displacement
Category
III (15-18%)
Lower
extremity neurologic impairment related to thoracolumbar injury
documented by examination findings of:
- Loss
of reflexes
- Loss
of motor strength and/or sensory loss
- Muscular
atrophy
- Neurologic
impairment verified by electrodiagnosis
Or:
- Significant
radiculopathy with disc herniation verified by imaging study
- Improvement
of radiculopathy following surgery
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- 25-50%
compression of one vertebral body (healed without loss of
structural integrity)
- Posterior
element fracture with mild displacement into the spinal
canal (healed without loss of structural integrity)
Category
IV (20-23%)
- Bilateral
or multilevel radiculopathy.
- Alteration
in motion segment integrity determined from flexion / extension
radiographs as 2.5mm or greater of translation of one vertebrae
on another (radiculopathy need not be present).
Or:
- More
than 50% compression of one vertebral body without residual
neurological compromise.
Category
V (25-28%)
- Impairment
of the lower extremity demonstrated in category III and
loss of structural integrity demonstrated in category IV.
Or:
- More
than 50% compression of one vertebral body with unilateral
neurological motor compromise (bilateral involvement-refer
to corticospinal tract involvement)
Lumbar Spine
(pp. 384-388)
Category
I (0%)
- No
significant clinical findings
- No
muscle spasm or guarding
- No
documentable neurological impairment
- No
alteration in structural integrity
- No
fractures
Category
II (5-8%)
- History
and exam relevant to a specific injury
May
include:
- Muscle
spasm
- Asymmetrical
loss of range of motion
- Complaints
of radiculopathy without objective findings
- No
alteration of structural integrity
Or:
- Clinically
significant radiculopathy with accompanying disc herniation
at expected site verified by imaging study that has no radicular
signs after nonoperative treatment
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- Less
than 25% compression of one vertebral body
- Healed
posterior element fracture without loss of structural integrity,
dislocation or radiculopathy
- Spinous
or transverse process fracture with displacement without
vertebral body fracture and without disruption of the spinal
canal
Category
III (10-13%)
Lower
extremity neurologic impairment related to thoracolumbar injury
document by examination findings of:
- Loss
of reflexes
- Loss
of motor strength and/or sensory loss
- Muscular
atrophy
- Neurologic
impairment verified by electrodiagnosis
Or:
- Radiculopathy
with disc herniation verified by imaging study
- Post
surgical asymptomatic radiculopathy
Or
one of the following Fractures:
- 25-50%
compression of one vertebral body (healed without loss of
structural integrity)
- Posterior
element fracture with displacement into the spinal canal
(healed without loss of structural integrity)
Category
IV (20-23%)
- Bilateral
or multilevel radiculopathy.
- Alteration
in motion segment integrity determined from flexion extension
radiographs as 4.5mm or greater of translation of one vertebrae
on another or angular motion of adjacent segment greater
than: 15 degrees for L1, L2, and L3, 20 degrees at L4-L5,
and 25 degrees at L5-S1 (radiculopathy need not be present).
Or:
- More
than 50% compression of one vertebral body without residual
neurological compromise.
Category
V (25-28%)
- Radiculopathy
demonstrated in category III and loss of motion segment
integrity demonstrated in category IV.
Or:
- More
than 50% compression of one vertebral body with unilateral
neurological motor compromise
REPORTING:
Documentation
is best presented in a narrative report.
Writing
narrative reports can seem tedious, daunting, or downright scary.
This doesnt have to be. Complete examinations and complete
record keeping makes report writing much simpler to do. The
fact is that reports are necessary communication tools. Procrastination
of or missing this important step in patient care will cause
delays in reimbursement, require multiple explanations to patients
about their diagnosis and treatment plans, and provide you with
hours of dread.
Like
any other form of communication, a report must have a purpose.
Often times, one report may serve many purposes. Examples may
include:
- Documenting
objective findings (for the file),
- Explanation
of procedures (for the insurance Co. or other responsible
party),
- Establishes
a necessity for care (third party payers),
- Establishes
a reference point on patient condition (for the patient),
- Demonstrates
your credibility (for referrals).
Types
of reports often presented are:
- Initial
Report
History
Exam
findings
Prognosis
Plan
- Interim
Report
Re-exam
findings
Changes
in prognosis
Plan
- Final
Report
Final
exam findings
Residual-impairment
Recommended
long term care
A
final few thoughts:
When
presenting your findings in a report format, impairment ratings
are very useful and at times even required. This is easily accomplished
by using the DRE method.
Remember
Loss of Motion Segment Integrity findings on flexion extension
radiographs are by definition a category IV impairment (20%
to 28% whole body impairment).
The
rest of the health care community understands Segmental Somatic
Dysfunction. We have called it Subluxation.